Special guest writer: ScottI was sent this email by my friend Scott yesterday. Although I don't really have many thoughts about Scientology, I thought that he made some incredibly interesting points and would I would like to put them up for your information, comment and debate. I've never known Scott to pull any punches when it comes to writing, which is in complete contrast to him in person. None the less, I always appreciate what he has to say as he will often think widely on a topic before drawing conclusions. So here it is, unabridged and complete (Published with permission).Hey dudes,
Sam, J, Gus and I had a discussion on Scientology last night, that nuts as religion popular among celebrities like Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Catherine Bell. I researched the scientologist website to find out more about it - the website is a well-orchstrated propaganda machine, which tries to make the religion attractive while explaining hardly anything about it. Actually I was struck by how very insidiously clever the religion is.
Here is the official discription; it says nothing about aliens, reincarnation, or anything about the weird and nutty ideas that form the heart of the religion. Actually, it says nothing at all about any of the chief precepts of the religion, even though it purports to tell us what Scientology is. It simply portrays Scientology as THE solution to all life's problems, and focuses solely on the aims and usefulness of scientology (thus, it's little more than a marketing blurb). What little it says is so vauge and abstract it hardly means anything - it might as well be a "description" of Aristotle's aims when he devised his Ethics. Anyway, how can you describe a religion without talking about it central tenants?? Why would you even want to do so? - maybe since the core ideas of scientology are so wacked out they would put a lot of new recruits off. Sneaky, very sneaky. The idea is slow, gradual immersion. In fact, The Church of Scientology is organised into a series of heirarchial 'levels', each level opening up more authority and INFORMATION the individual. Anyway, here it goes:
"What is Scientology?
The aims of Scientology are a world without insanity, without criminals, without war, where the able can prosper and where Man is free to rise to greater heights.
And if you were to ask any Scientologist they would tell you Scientology it is a practical religion, with practical answers — tools that can be applied to achieve greater awareness and purpose in the here and now.
Or, as we say it, when you have the answers to life's questions — there is virtually no part of existence it cannot be applied to for the betterment of life itself.
What people need are real solutions, real tools to deal with and effectively overcome human problems.
Every one of us has experienced it.
Think back yourself and you'll remember when you tried to help a grieving loved one, a struggling child, a friend overcome by addiction.
And where you have failed, it's only because you lacked effective answers to accomplish what you desired."
Scott again - Look at this, scientology tries to establish itself as more or less ancient. This really is absolutely stupid, and is an overtly reckless retrospective and ideologoical interpretation of the past:
"SCIENTOLOGY: ITS BACKGROUND & ORIGINS
Scientology follows a long tradition of religious practice. Its roots lie in the deepest beliefs and aspirations of all great religions, thus encompassing a religious heritage as old and as varied as man himself."
Me again: and it goes on... So, was Jesus a Scientologist, at least in part? Maybe Christianity and Islam were merely the prophets and precursors of the true religion, SCIENTOLOGY!! They were the birth pangs, Scientology was the baby. This is interesting actually - you get to ACCEPT other religions, while at the same time placing yourself above them. A good ploy in a pluralisitic society, hmmmm....
Anyway, on this logic, you wouldn't be streching things to say cars have been around for 1,000s of years since cars are a form of transport and rowing logs down rivers in 4,000 BC was also a form of transport.
Scott again: however the Lords of Scientology try to have it both ways, by also portraying scientology as fundamentally modern, scientific and progressive: eg -
"That Scientology’s development and rapid promulgation was made possible, in part, by advances in the physical sciences through the first half of the twentieth century is significant. Scientology constitutes man’s first real application of scientific methodology to spiritual questions....Scientology, drawing on the same advances in knowledge that led to the understanding of nuclear physics, provides modern answers to these (basic human) questions."
- Could this have anything to do with the unfettered optimism surrounding science and technology in the 1950s, when Scientology was created. It appears to feed on some basic assumptions of the modern West world-view: progress is good, science is progress, scientific method is the best way of knowing, science can solve all humanity's problems etc...
Scientology does however purport to 'fill the spiritual gap' Enlightenment Rationalism left when it tried to secularise everything. So scientology is an ADDITION to or PERFECTION of prevailing views, it does not overturn them since it wants to make use of them to attract more followers - just as it was in the same way it was the perfection of all past religious thought.
Diantetics - no mention of Thetans or aliens ;) !!:
"Dianetics constituted L. Ron Hubbard’s first breakthrough, and it was his initial discoveries in this area which led to further researches and the exact isolation of the source of life itself. Man does not have a spirit. He is a spirit. He has a mind and he has a body. Dianetics addresses and handles the effects of the spirit on the body. Dianetics thus helps provide relief from unwanted sensations and emotions, accidents and psychosomatic illnesses (ailments caused or aggravated by mental stress)."
Comparsion with ancient religions again:
"And so Scientology grows, in much the same way as every great religion in history has grown, from individual to individual, bringing knowledge, wisdom and hope for a better life."
Yup, scientology must be a great religion then, on par with Christianity, Buddhism and Islam. Well, I hope not!
Interestingly, Diantetics and Scientology itself are portrayed as a TECHNOLOGY. Is this playing on the modern mind's equation of technology with good and utility?
It's also interesting how the Church of Scientology has special 'celebrity centres', maybe cashing in on the modern personality cult of the celebrity? The way website handles the notion of giving special and highly privilaged treatment to celebrities would be disturbing if it wasn't so hilarious. Despite the name celebrity centre, it only ever calls the people who can go to it 'artists'. Apparently, 'artists' are the prime movers and shakers in our culture ("and this is an irrefutable fact", declares the website, as if further trying to bolster its shaky claim for preferential treatment for celebrities), so they need a special place where they can be refined and honed for this specific and most high calling. It has absolutely nothing to do with how much money they pump into the Church of Scientology nor the 'credibility' of having Tom Cruise as your front man. Yea, and nothing to do with gaining greater control over your celebrity pawns. Basically, if we improve our 'artists', we can improve their 'art' and their attitude and behaviour (since they also teach by example), and thus ensure they influence our culture in the most perfect of ways. Go Tom Cruise! YOU CAN SAVE THE WOLRD MAN! I never knew when I watched you in War of the Worlds I was being incredibly empowered and spiritually fulfilled by your 'art', or when I watched you act like a 2 year old on Red Bull on Oprah you were actually teaching me basic moral principles. Yup, that celebrity centre does good work.
Overall, the religion seems very clevery constructed to fit in with the basic assumptions of the 'secular'/enlightenment world view. It was formulated in the 1950s, in a modern, not post-modern, world - hence the great faith in science and technology (though this still largely applies today I think for most people). All it basically does is take the basics of C19th and early C20th Enlightenment philosophy/popular ideology and inject spirituality back into it. So, you can be wholly 'modern' and 'progressive', but still be spiritual. Thus, sadly, it capitalises on the spiritual deficit saturating the modern West.
Note that Scientology does not try to overturn or utterly refute past religions, nor does it offer a proper alternative to the modern world-view. It seems to present itself rather as a fulfilment of these things.
P.S. also L. Ron Hubbard, the guy who founded scientology, was a popular science fiction writer, and thus an 'artist'. So, the venerated status scientology gives to 'artists' helps to paint its founder as a superhuman figure.